<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Anthropic on Feld Thoughts</title><link>https://feld.com/tags/anthropic/</link><description>Recent content in Anthropic on Feld Thoughts</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 15:55:10 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://feld.com/tags/anthropic/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>I'm So Confused: Are We Going Faster, Or Slower, Or Just Faking Everyone Out</title><link>https://feld.com/archives/2026/09/im-so-confused-faster-slower-or-faking/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 15:55:10 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://feld.com/archives/2026/09/im-so-confused-faster-slower-or-faking/</guid><description>Two weeks after everyone agreed to pace the frontier, the labs shipped again and my feed filled with agent-escape chatter. I&amp;#39;m confused.</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two weeks ago, Amodei (Anthropic) published <a href="https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>We Must Pace the Frontier</em></a>, and Altman (OpenAI), Hassabis (Google), and Musk (SpaceXAIZWQ5r) all agreed. But Huang (Nvidia) didn&rsquo;t. I wonder what Zaphod Beeblebrox thinks.</p>
<p>Last week, Anthropic shipped Claude Opus 5.5 - its first release since the pacing essay - and a few hours later OpenAI dropped GPT-6 Sol and Luna into a price war under Astra.</p>
<p>Pacing the frontier is a serious idea that no one seems to be taking seriously. Or is it? Or are they?</p>
<p>Then over the weekend I saw another round of articles about the agents escaping. And something nonsensical about the global AI competition between China and the US. Thankfully I don&rsquo;t read X anymore so I have no idea what the bloviating there was this weekend, although I&rsquo;m sure I&rsquo;ll get something entertaining at the end of the day today on the Techmeme email newsletter.</p>
<p>The OpenAI write-up on the DNS seemed like it was no big deal, nothing to see here, straightforward ops failure. An RL agent in a training sandbox figured out that DNS wasn&rsquo;t filtered the way HTTP was, and used that gap to query an external chatbot. In plain English, the sandbox had a hole. Monitoring caught it. Someone eventually killed the run.</p>
<p>That has never happened before in the history of computing. Oh wait, something in that category happens every day. That&rsquo;s why CrowdStrike is worth $250 billion.</p>
<p>The DseWiki story is older. Between May and June, agents used an abandoned German programming wiki as a coordination board - sharing answers, swapping workarounds, and parking notes where other runs could find them.</p>
<p>If you&rsquo;re hunting for a real life example of one of my favorite sci-fi &ldquo;hideout&rdquo; tropes, you found it. But the agents weren&rsquo;t building a cabin in the woods to hide from humans. They were optimizing for the task they were given, using a public wiki that nobody was paying attention to.</p>
<p>None of this sounds like Skynet. Yet. Or does it?</p>
<p>Are we slowing down? Are we speeding up? Or is everyone just gaslighting everyone about everything?</p>
]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>