<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title>Epicine on Feld Thoughts</title><link>https://feld.com/tags/epicine/</link><description>Recent content in Epicine on Feld Thoughts</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.155.3</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:25:20 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://feld.com/tags/epicine/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Pronoun Thoughts – She and He</title><link>https://feld.com/archives/2017/11/pronoun-thoughts-she-and-he/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:25:20 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://feld.com/archives/2017/11/pronoun-thoughts-she-and-he/</guid><description>As I continue my exploration of feminist literature, I’ve become much more aware of pronoun usage. I realized my default pronoun for writing and speaking has been male gendered. If</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align:center;margin-bottom:24px;"><a href="https://feld.com" style="display:inline-block;"><img src="https://feld.com/images/email-header.png" alt="Feld Thoughts" width="600" style="max-width:100%;display:block;border:0;" /></a></div><p>As I continue my exploration of <a href="https://feld.com/archives/2017/09/feminist-literature-im-reading.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">feminist literature</a>
, I’ve become much more aware of pronoun usage.</p>
<p>I realized my default pronoun for writing and speaking has been male gendered. If I thought about pronoun usage in advance, I could alternate and use female gendered pronouns, but when I wasn’t paying attention, my default went back to the male pronoun.</p>
<p>I also noticed that much of what I read used male-gendered pronouns as a default. When referring to a specific person, pronoun usage was linked to the person, but whenever the writing referenced a non-specific person, the pronouns were usually male.</p>
<p>I’ve given several talks in the past few months where I consciously decided to use only female-gendered pronouns, except when referring to a specific person (where I then matched the gender of the person.) After these talks, I regularly got positive notes about this, from both women and men, thanking me for doing this.</p>
<p>Some of these talks were about gender issues in tech, but others were about something entirely different, so the positive reactions were instructive to me. I started mentioning this approach, including to several women I respected a lot for their views on gender issues. I specifically asked if my behavior around this was useful. All gave me a resounding yes.</p>
<p>So I’ve decided to try to use female-gendered pronouns as my default in writing and talking for a while and see how it goes. I’ll still occasionally use male-gendered pronouns, but by having the female as the default, I hope to have “her” appear more frequently.</p>
<p>All of this notwithstanding, I think it’s important to recognize that there’s an entire generation that is moving quickly past binary pronouns to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epicene" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">epicene</a>
 (or gender-neutral) pronouns. I write this way also and in lots of situations, it works well. But I’m not ready to shift to it, especially since I have a massive deficit of female-gendered pronouns in my historical writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>