<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Warren Buffett on Feld Thoughts</title><link>https://feld.com/tags/warren-buffett/</link><description>Recent content in Warren Buffett on Feld Thoughts</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 08:02:35 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://feld.com/tags/warren-buffett/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Turn Every Page</title><link>https://feld.com/archives/2025/05/turn-every-page/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 08:02:35 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://feld.com/archives/2025/05/turn-every-page/</guid><description>I learned how to do deals from Len Fassler. Last week, I got an email from Dustin Kloempken, who sent me a few quotes he wrote down from the Berkshire</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learned how to do deals from <a href="https://feld.com/archives/2021/01/rip-len-fassler/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Len Fassler.</a> Last week, I got an email from <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/dustinkloempken/overlay/about-this-profile/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dustin Kloempken</a>, who sent me a few quotes he wrote down from the Berkshire Annual Meeting. One of them jumped out at me.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“<em>Turn every page. One important ingredient in the investment field that very few people do. And those people who did read every page aren’t telling you what they learned. You have to read every page.</em>“</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In 1996, I was sitting in a law firm conference room in NYC next to Len. We were working on the legal documents for Sage Hosting’s (which we renamed Interliant after we merged with a company named Interliant) first acquisition. It was tiny—a web hosting company doing maybe $100,000 of revenue annually. We had decided to buy this tiny company to get going.</p>
<p>Len read every page of the legal draft of the purchase agreement and marked it up. After reading a page, he’d slide it over to me to read and see what he’d marked up. We had the disclosure document, so we went through those pages.</p>
<p>By 1996, I’d done a lot of angel investments and a few VC investments, but only a few acquisitions. And, I’d deferred to the lawyers on the legal documents. While I generally knew what was happening, there was plenty of fine print that I hadn’t bothered to read or understand.</p>
<p>After an hour, I asked Len why he was going through every page. He told me, “Brad, in any document you sign, you should turn every page. It’s good practice for any document you read, but even if you are skimming, turn every page to make sure you don’t miss anything.”</p>
<p>I bought a green felt-tip pen and started doing this. As documents became predominantly online, I opened them and turned every page. I read every email I received. Even when I skim a book, I turn every page.</p>
<p>Today, I received many Docusigns with just the signature page. This bugs me, and I often ask for the entire document before I sign. Given that I’ve looked at a zillion legal documents, I can turn every page pretty quickly. But I still turn every page in a board package, a legal document that is new to me, or a long paper (academic or white paper) that someone sends me.</p>
<p>Fortunately, I’m a fast reader and have high reading comprehension. I can also read by paragraph (vs. by sentence), so skimming works for looking for things that are out of place.</p>
<p>I love it when people put <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Easter_eggs_in_Microsoft_products" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">easter eggs in documents</a> to see if they get read. For example, a set of Return Path board minutes from about a decade ago had something like the following paragraph.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>“After our lunch break, where we enjoyed Shake Shack, Mr. Feld drank two Shake Shack Chocolate Shakes in rapid succession. After a few minutes, he had to lie on the floor and nap for about 30 minutes.”</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Turn every page—great advice from Len Fassler and Warren Buffett.</p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The American Tailwind ﻿</title><link>https://feld.com/archives/2019/02/the-american-tailwind-/</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2019 08:01:15 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://feld.com/archives/2019/02/the-american-tailwind-/</guid><description>Every year, one of my favorite things to read is the Berkshire Hathaway annual letter. The 2018 version is out and, as always, is a beautiful thing to read if</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Every year, one of my favorite things to read is the</em> <a href="http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/2018ltr.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Berkshire Hathaway annual letter</em></a><em>. The 2018 version is out and, as always, is a beautiful thing to read if you have any interest in business and economics.</em></p>
<p><em>I particularly loved Warren Buffett’s reflections at the end of the letter in a section called The American Tailwind, which follows:</em></p>
<p>On March 11th, it will be 77 years since I first invested in an American business. The year was 1942, I was 11, and I went all in, investing $114.75 I had begun accumulating at age six. What I bought was three shares of Cities Service preferred stock. I had become a capitalist, and it felt good.</p>
<p>Let’s now travel back through the two 77-year periods that preceded my purchase. That leaves us starting in 1788, a year prior to George Washington’s installation as our first president. Could anyone then have imagined what their new country would accomplish in only three 77-year lifetimes?</p>
<p>During the two 77-year periods prior to 1942, the United States had grown from four million people – about 1⁄2 of 1% of the world’s population – into the most powerful country on earth. In that spring of 1942, though, it faced a crisis: The U.S. and its allies were suffering heavy losses in a war that we had entered only three months earlier. Bad news arrived daily.</p>
<p>Despite the alarming headlines, almost all Americans believed on that March 11th that the war would be won. Nor was their optimism limited to that victory. Leaving aside congenital pessimists, Americans believed that their children and generations beyond would live far better lives than they themselves had led.</p>
<p>The nation’s citizens understood, of course, that the road ahead would not be a smooth ride. It never had been. Early in its history our country was tested by a Civil War that killed 4% of all American males and led President Lincoln to openly ponder whether “a nation so conceived and so dedicated could long endure.” In the 1930s, America suffered through the Great Depression, a punishing period of massive unemployment.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, in 1942, when I made my purchase, the nation expected post-war growth, a belief that proved to be well-founded. In fact, the nation’s achievements can best be described as breathtaking.</p>
<p>Let’s put numbers to that claim: If my $114.75 had been invested in a no-fee S&amp;P 500 index fund, and all dividends had been reinvested, my stake would have grown to be worth (pre-taxes) $606,811 on January 31, 2019 (the latest data available before the printing of this letter). That is a gain of <em>5,288 for 1.</em> Meanwhile, a $1 million investment by a tax-free institution of that time – say, a pension fund or college endowment – would have grown to about $5.3 <em>billion</em>.</p>
<p>Let me add one additional calculation that I believe will shock you: If that hypothetical institution had paid only <em>1%</em> of assets annually to various “helpers,” such as investment managers and consultants, its gain would have been <em>cut in half</em>, to $2.65 billion. That’s what happens over 77 years when the 11.8% annual return actually achieved by the S&amp;P 500 is recalculated at a 10.8% rate.</p>
<p>Those who regularly preach doom because of government budget deficits (as I regularly did myself for many years) might note that our country’s national debt has increased roughly 400-fold during the last of my 77-year periods. That’s 40,000%! Suppose you had foreseen this increase and panicked at the prospect of runaway deficits and a worthless currency. To “protect” yourself, you might have eschewed stocks and opted instead to buy 31⁄4 ounces of gold with your $114.75.</p>
<p>And what would that supposed protection have delivered? You would now have an asset worth about $4,200, <em>less than 1% of what</em> would have been realized from a simple unmanaged investment in American business. The magical metal was no match for the American mettle.</p>
<p>Our country’s almost unbelievable prosperity has been gained in a bipartisan manner. Since 1942, we have had seven Republican presidents and seven Democrats. In the years they served, the country contended at various times with a long period of viral inflation, a 21% prime rate, several controversial and costly wars, the resignation of a president, a pervasive collapse in home values, a paralyzing financial panic and a host of other problems. All engendered scary headlines; all are now history.</p>
<p>Christopher Wren, architect of St. Paul’s Cathedral, lies buried within that London church. Near his tomb are posted these words of description (translated from Latin): “If you would seek my monument, look around you.” Those skeptical of America’s economic playbook should heed his message.</p>
<p>In 1788 – to go back to our starting point – there really wasn’t much here <em>except</em> for a small band of ambitious people and an embryonic governing framework aimed at turning their dreams into reality. Today, the Federal Reserve estimates our household wealth at $108 <em>trillion</em>, an amount almost impossible to comprehend.</p>
<p>Remember, earlier in this letter, how I described retained earnings as having been the key to Berkshire’s prosperity? So it has been with America. In the nation’s accounting, the comparable item is labeled “savings.” And save we have. If our forefathers had instead consumed all they produced, there would have been no investment, no productivity gains and no leap in living standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>